Skip to main content

Internal pay dispersion and state ownership in Brazilian listed firms

Published: Oct 13, 2026
Volume: 24
Keywords: Executive compensation Internal pay dispersion State ownership Top-earner pay slice Brazil

Authors

Martha Regina Meira Bianchi
Universidade Federal de São Paulo
F. Henrique Castro
Escola de Economia de São Paulo - Fundação Getulio Vargas

Abstract

We describe how internally compressed executive pay is in Brazilian listed firms with and without state ownership, using the ratio of the highest individual compensation to the mean compensation of the statutory executive board. The panel covers 4,155 firm-years and 594 firms between 2015 and 2025. Three descriptive facts stand out. Firms with a state stake have more compressed pay, and this difference is about six times larger inside the financial sector than outside it on proportional measures; that sector is excluded by construction from the only prior Brazilian study of this measure. Conditioning on sector by year widens the difference rather than absorbing it, so it is not accounted for by the distribution of state-linked firms across sectors. No within-firm association is detected: with firm fixed effects the coefficient is positive, small and statistically indistinguishable from zero.


How to cite

Martha Regina Meira Bianchi, F. Henrique Castro. Internal pay dispersion and state ownership in Brazilian listed firms. Brazilian Review of Finance, v. 24, n. 1, 2026. p. e202616. DOI: 10.12660/rbfin.v24n1.2026.98994.


References

Abdalla, D. C. (2021). Efeito da estrutura de propriedade sobre o CEO pay slice. Dissertação de mestrado, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas, Rio de Janeiro. https://hdl.handle.net/10438/30189
Bebchuk, L. A., Cremers, K. J. M. & Peyer, U. C. (2011). The CEO pay slice. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.006
Bianchi, M. R. M. & Castro, F. H. F. (2025). Government ownership in Brazilian publicly traded companies: A descriptive analysis. Brazilian Review of Finance, 23(1), e202514. https://doi.org/10.12660/rbfin.v23n1.2025.93982
Boubakri, N., Cosset, J.-C. & Saffar, W. (2013). The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.007
Chen, J., Ezzamel, M. & Cai, Z. (2011). Managerial power theory, tournament theory, and executive pay in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4), 1176–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.04.008
Connelly, B. L., Haynes, K. T., Tihanyi, L., Gamache, D. L. & Devers, C. E. (2016). Minding the gap: Antecedents and consequences of top management-to-worker pay dispersion. Journal of Management, 42(4), 862–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503015
Ermel, M. D. A. & do Monte, P. A. (2018). Controle acionário, remuneração de executivos e desempenho empresarial: Evidências para o mercado brasileiro. Brazilian Review of Finance, 16(3), 455–491. https://doi.org/10.12660/rbfin.v16n3.2018.55898
Kale, J. R., Reis, E. & Venkateswaran, A. (2009). Rank-order tournaments and incentive alignment: The effect on firm performance. The Journal of Finance, 64(3), 1479–1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01470.x
Lazear, E. P. & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841–864. https://doi.org/10.1086/261010
Levine, D. I. (1991). Cohesiveness, productivity, and wage dispersion. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 15(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(91)90031-r
Siegel, P. A. & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms. Organization Science, 16(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0128