Skip to main content

Portfolio optimization for institutional investors: Risk parity and long-term objectives

Published: May 16, 2026
Volume: 24
Keywords: Risk parity Institutional investors Portfolio optimization HRP CVaR Risk management

Authors

Luís Eduardo Nunes
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
André Luís da Silva Leite
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Abstract

This study investigates the integration of risk parity models with the long-term objectives of institutional investors, comparing them with traditional portfolio allocation approaches over 2000-2024. We evaluate seven strategies: 60/40, minimum variance, equal weighting, maximum Sharpe, traditional risk parity, Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP), and CVaR-based risk parity. The results indicate that HRP and CVaR-based risk parity offer stronger risk-return profiles, with lower drawdowns and greater resilience in stressed markets. A moderate allocation to illiquid assets improves returns and risk-adjusted performance metrics. The study suggests that pension funds, insurance companies, endowments, and family offices can benefit from advanced risk parity models as a core portfolio approach, dynamically adapting to market conditions.

How to cite

Luís Eduardo Nunes, André Luís da Silva Leite. Portfolio optimization for institutional investors: Risk parity and long-term objectives. Brazilian Review of Finance, v. 24, n. 1, 2026. p. e202608. DOI: 10.12660/rbfin.v24n1.2026.97825.


References

Ang, A., Papanikolaou, D. & Westerfield, M. M. (2014). Portfolio choice with illiquid assets. Management Science, 60(11), 2737-2761. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1986
Bacen (2025). Relatório de estabilidade financeira. v. 24 n. 2, Banco Central do Brasil, Brasília, DF. https://www.bcb.gov.br/content/publicacoes/ref/202510/RELESTAB202510-refPub.pdf
Deković, D. & Šimović, P. P. (2025). Hierarchical risk parity: Efficient implementation and real world analysis. Future Generation Computer Systems, 167, 107744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2025.107744
Diseko, N. V., Bonga-Bonga, L. & Manguzvane, M. M. (2015). Dynamic portfolio rebalancing with safe-haven assets. MPRA Paper 123408, Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Posted 22 Jan. 2025. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/123408/
Gubu, L. & Hilmi, M. R. (2024). Beyond mean-variance Markowitz portfolio selection: A comparison of mean-variance-skewness-kurtosis model and robust mean-variance model. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 58(1/2024), 298-313. https://doi.org/10.24818/18423264/58.1.24.19
Krokhmal, P., Palmquist, J. & Uryasev, S. (2002). Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. Journal of Risk, 4(2), 43-68. https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2002.057
Ledoit, O. & Wolf, M. (2012). Nonlinear shrinkage estimation of large-dimensional covariance matrices. The Annals of Statistics, 40(2), 1024-1060. https://doi.org/10.1214/12-AOS989
Lee, J., Jeon, H., Bae, H. & Lee, Y. (2025). Return prediction for mean-variance portfolio selection: How decision-focused learning shapes forecasting models. Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance, ICAIF '25, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, p. 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1145/3768292.3770423
López de Prado, M. (2016). Building diversified portfolios that outperform out of sample. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 42(4), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2016.42.4.059
Nguyen, M. D. (2025). Advanced investing with deep learning for risk-aligned portfolio optimization. PLoS One, 20(8), e0330547. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330547
Palit, D. & Prybutok, V. R. (2024). A study of Hierarchical Risk Parity in portfolio construction. Journal of Economic Analysis, 3(3), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.58567/jea03030006
Prihatiningsih, P., Early, Q. R. & Rois, M. (2025). Portfolio optimization: A comparative analysis a single index and Markowitz model. Journal of Finance and Business Digital, 4(1), 259-278. https://doi.org/10.55927/jfbd.v4i1.73
Qureshi, F., Qureshi, S., Ismail, I. & Yarovaya, L. (2025). Unlocking economic insights: ESG integration, market dynamics and sustainable transitions. Energy Economics, 145, 108407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108407
Rudin, A. & Marr, W. M. (2016). Investor views, drawdown-based risk parity, and hedge fund portfolio construction. The Journal of Alternative Investments, 19(2), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2016.19.2.063
Silva, L. P. d., Alem, D. & Carvalho, F. L. d. (2017). Portfolio optimization using mean absolute deviation (MAD) and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR). Production, 27, e20162088. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.208816
Sullivan, R. N. & Wey, M. (2025). Risk parity and its discontents. Working Paper 5165202, Darden Business School. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5165202
Swensen, D. F. (2009). Pioneering portfolio management: An unconventional approach to institutional investment, fully revised and updated. Simon and Schuster, New York. https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Pioneering-Portfolio-Management/David-F-Swensen/9781416544692